GUEST COMMENTARY [Name withheld by request out of fear of retaliation] For two decades, Leo Lutz has occupied the mayor's office in Columbia, and his supporters are quick to credit him with every positive development in our borough, but leadership is a two-way street. If Mayor Lutz is going to accept praise for Columbia's successes, many of which, frankly, he had little direct involvement in, then he must also be held accountable for our failures. The facts paint a troubling picture. Despite the mayor's repeated assurances that our streets are safe, we've witnessed a disturbing rise in assaults, shootings, and vandalism. His promises have fallen by the wayside: the foot patrol we were promised never materialized, nor did the bike patrol that was supposed to increase our sense of security. Fiscally, the situation is equally dire. Taxes have increased at least twice during Mayor Lutz's tenure, yet the borough now finds itself millions of dollars in debt. This isn...
Comments
The Military Commissions Act and the National Defense Authorization Act, as well as other brazen perversions of justice and legality have shredded the Fourth Amendment. But how many people do you hear howling about that? They will, however, scream about the government taking their guns, as if it could, and as if a few yahoos with AR-15s could stand up against the United States military's superior training and weaponry. The yahoos would be taken out in about 15 seconds. True, the original intent of the Second Amendment was for the citizenry to be able to keep the government out of our faces, but the founders wanted us to maintain a well-regulated militia that's always at the ready, and where is that? I haven't seen any groups of people marching up and down Locust Street and drilling around town.
Also, if you strictly abide by the language of the Second Amendment, no one has a constitutional right to fire weapons. Sorry, but the Second Amendment says we have the right to KEEP and BEAR arms, but it doesn't say we may fire them. Those who think otherwise might be better served by citing the First Amendment and saying that shooting a gun is an expression of speech, and what tells someone you don't like them more than a bullet to the forehead? Now, that's a powerful message!
But again, the Second Amendment does give us the right to keep and bear arms. It also says that right shall not be infringed. Theoretically, then, that means we can have anything up to and including nuclear weapons. Therefore, I want a 20-megaton hydrogen bomb I can keep in my backyard, strictly as a deterrent. I want all my neighbors to have one, too. And if the feds try messing with us - BOOM! - there goes Columbia. That'll show' em who's boss!