Friday, February 27, 2026

Poetry Buzz: A Columbia couple builds art, community through the power of verse - TheBurg

Restaurant Inspections – Columbia Borough – February 27, 2026


King's Butcher Shop, 15 S. Third St., Columbia, Feb. 21. Pass. Prepackaged ground beef from the facility's other retail store is not labeled properly with a distributed-by statement. A working container of sanitizer was stored with bagged pretzels.

King's Country Flavorites, 15 S. Third St., Columbia, Feb. 21. Pass. Observed employee rinsing out a flowerpot in the designated hand-wash sink.

Li'l Stacks Pa, 15 S. Third St., Columbia, Feb. 21. Pass. Food employee (owner) observed preparing food and not wearing a beard cover. The hand-wash sink does not have water at a temperature of at least 85 F. The fuse for the hot-water heater had blown; fuse was replaced and hot water was restored.

Columbia Presbyterian Celebration, 360 Locust St., Columbia, complaint, Feb. 18. Pass. No violations.

Park Elementary School, 50 S. Sixth St., Columbia, Feb. 18. Pass. No violations.

Columbia High School
, 901 Ironville Pike, Columbia, Feb. 17. Pass. No violations.

Taylor Middle School, 45 N. Ninth St., Columbia, Feb. 17. Pass. No violations.

Smoke N Chill, 353 Cherry St., Columbia, Feb. 17. Pass. New food facility in operation more than 90 days and has not employed a certified food employee as required. The food facility does not maintain Food Employee Certification records as required. Plumbing system not maintained in good repair: observed water leaking at the drainpipe of the hand-wash sink and the three-compartment sink.

Thursday, February 26, 2026

Local business owner questions council about controversial email

Jesse Sweigart addressed council Tuesday night about allegations in an email sent to borough officials. 

JOE LINTNER | COLUMBIA SPY 

An email sent to borough officials and others in recent weeks is raising questions about alleged misconduct, internal conflicts, and lack of transparency in Columbia Borough government.

Jesse Sweigart, local business owner and administrator of columbiapa.online, says that the email, which references incidents involving borough officials between 2024 and 2025, contains allegations  that point to ethical issues in the borough. He says officials have stayed silent despite being aware of the email, and asked for them to take action. 

Sweigart read from a prepared statement when he addressed council at the February 24, 2026 Columbia Borough Council meeting.  

"Why has nobody publicly addressed or called for an investigation into the troubling email that every news organization and several elected officials have already received?" Sweigart asked. "The public is aware that something is wrong. The silence only makes it worse."

Sweigart said the email contains "graphic and disturbing" allegations about inappropriate images sent on borough-issued devices. He said the email also mentions missing records and internal pressure on employees. He asked for council's acknowledgment that the email exists, as well as for an independent review. He noted, however, that none of the allegations have been verified. 

"No one is asking this council to declare guilt," Sweigart continued. "What the community is asking is for acknowledgement, transparency and a commitment to due process." He said that if the allegations are false, council's admission would clear the air. "Why hasn't anyone suggested even a preliminary inquiry? If the allegations are false, then why not say so we can clear the air?" 

"I urge this council to acknowledge the existence of this email and concerning nature, because I spoke to a few of you, and we know it exists," Sweigart said.


Zink: "You're demanding we tell you things...that we're legally not allowed to discuss."

Ultimately, officials ignored Sweigart's concerns. Heather Zink, council vice president, reacted defensively. "You all act like you're calling for investigation and this and that. How do you know we haven't already done anything—because we haven't told you?" Zink asked. "You said you're not demanding action, but yet you are demanding action." Zink said council cannot legally discuss the issues, because they're personnel matters. 

Evan Gabel, borough solicitor, agreed, saying the borough cannot and will not comment on personnel matters.