Now's the time to think about what kind of country we want.
With that in mind, here's some food for thought from around the web:
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Comments
Anonymous said…
I am not against gun control,but are Ak-47 need for the public to own. If someone wants to shoot guns like this, have ranges where you can go,shoot them and return to the range owner.But again,guns do not kill people,but people do.
Anonymous said…
It is time that our leaders stop playing with these terrorist groups and attack there strongholds. You watch them on newscast in their training camps in Syria. Hit them with some bunker busting bombs and some weapons. Maybe they will get the message we are fed up with their games.
Anonymous said…
No one as a private citizen has to own an assault rifle. If you feel as if you need a machine like that...there is real problem. See a psychiatrist immediately please.
Anonymous said…
It's not the gun, it's the person behind the gun.
Anonymous said…
Repeat, no one needs an assault rifle, if they think that they do, there is a mental problem. So, if "it's the person behind the gun", why would you want the crazy people to buy assault weapons?
Actually this weapon is not an AR15. It would be a M4/M16 regulated by the NFA. You see, if you look, and do your research before flying off the handle, it has a selector switch for full auto and what looks like a 10-14" barrel. These weapons can only be obtained 3 ways. 1. A military base was broken into and weapons were stolen. 2. A person broke into a wealthy persons home (I'll explain in #3) and stole weapons from them. 3. A person went into a Class III firearms dealer, picked out this firearm and paid them no less than $20,000. Then filled out the paperwork and waited 6 months to get it approved by the NFA/ATF. Also remember civilians can only own full auto weapons manufactured before 1984. Look, what happened was horrible and should never have happened. But, this person regardless of religion, sex, affiliation or whatever planned on hurting people. If the guns we're not available there would have been something else. Bombs are easier and more effective with what's available on the Internet and everything can be bought at a box box store. Instead of rushing to blaming guns, blame the person who did the crime. We need to unite as a country, as Americans, regardless of what church we go to or what party we vote for or who we go home with at night. I am republican, I am Christian, I am Ems professional, I am USMC and I am an American. Love your neighbors, stop blaming guns, and grow up. Blame the person just like you would blame the drunk driver for hitting and killing a buss load of people. You wouldn't blame the car they were driving.
Anonymous said…
Amen
Anonymous said…
Very well said! Thank you ��
Anonymous said…
Grow up? What a childish thing to say to anyone. I know that I am older than you and was a professional as well, with a career that spanned decades. If someone claims to be Christian, why would they resort to talk like that and where, in your god's name, is your compassion for the victims. People worry more about owning a certain style of gun than they do about victims. I am proud to say that is one area that I lack education in, guns. I have no need to know all there is to know about guns, that does not fit into the world I live in. Controlling some gun purchases will not interfere with your gun ownership. As always, when there is no argument, resort to name calling.
Anonymous said…
I wouldn't brag about being a Republican.
Anonymous said…
I do love my neighbors and I don't want to see them shot to death.
Anonymous said…
very well said Autumn and thank you for serving our country. people don't really get the "it's people who kill people" NOT guns that kill people.
Anonymous said…
They should dramatically raise the cost of ammo. Would definitely limit one's purchase... make people more selective in there use. If you can't afford a box of bullets.. your guns no use.
Anonymous said…
Our Country isn't all bad, our Borough is a different Story.
Chris Vera [Columbia Spy file photo] The following information is excerpted from a December 6, 2025 LNP Watchdog article by LNP | LancasterOnline reporter Jade Campos. Still reeling from an abrupt firing from his role as head of the Columbia Market House in March, Chris Vera was surprised to get a letter in the mail from a Columbia Borough attorney two weeks later telling him he was banned indefinitely from borough property. The letter gave no reason for the ban. Nine months later, Vera, who has served as president of the Columbia Historic Preservation Society for more than a decade and has helped with the borough’s comprehensive plan, is still banned from borough property. He believes the ban includes borough parks, which is part of the reason he moved his annual Albatwitch Day festival, which celebrates the myth of a local cryptid, to Wrightsville. Vera said he’s not sure why the borough went to such lengths to keep him away from public spaces given his termination from the borough s...
NATHAN WILLISON | LNP Staff Writer An East Donegal Township man is facing criminal charges after police say he struck a 13-year-old with his truck and fled the scene last month. Derek Scott Mohr, 28, is charged with causing an accident involving death or injury without a license, failing to stop to render aid, driving at an unsafe speed and related charges. Mohr had been driving a 2013 Chevrolet Silverado through Chestnut Street in Columbia around 8 p.m. March 20 when he struck a 13-year-old boy riding a motorized scooter and continued driving, according to charging documents filed by police. When police arrived, they found the boy with a broken leg and a cut to his forehead. His scooter was lying nearby, its handlebars completely snapped off. Another teenager who witnessed what happened described the truck to police and said that the driver made no attempt to stop after striking the boy. Surveillance footage collected from the area shows the truck striking the b...
GUEST COMMENTARY [Name withheld by request out of fear of retaliation] For two decades, Leo Lutz has occupied the mayor's office in Columbia, and his supporters are quick to credit him with every positive development in our borough, but leadership is a two-way street. If Mayor Lutz is going to accept praise for Columbia's successes, many of which, frankly, he had little direct involvement in, then he must also be held accountable for our failures. The facts paint a troubling picture. Despite the mayor's repeated assurances that our streets are safe, we've witnessed a disturbing rise in assaults, shootings, and vandalism. His promises have fallen by the wayside: the foot patrol we were promised never materialized, nor did the bike patrol that was supposed to increase our sense of security. Fiscally, the situation is equally dire. Taxes have increased at least twice during Mayor Lutz's tenure, yet the borough now finds itself millions of dollars in debt. This isn...
Comments
So, if "it's the person behind the gun", why would you want the crazy people to buy assault weapons?
ownership. As always, when there is no argument, resort to name calling.