Municipal Authority vs "Professional Services" - What's the bottom line?
Shown below is a September 8, 2016 letter from the Columbia Municipal Authority to Columbia Borough Council urging council not to dissolve the authority. The unanimous vote for dissolution subsequently took place at the regular council meeting on September 12. At the time, Council President Kelly Murphy said there was no animosity between the authority and the borough over the decision. According to an LNP article ("Municipal Briefs" 9/21/16), Borough Manager Greg Sahd said the entity was no longer needed because its chief responsibility was to manage the borough's sewer system. [The wastewater operation was sold to LASA in 2015.] The authority's letter, however, specifies numerous benefits to the borough in keeping the authority.
At a special meeting on Monday, November 28, 2016, council voted to fund a $75,800 study on the feasibility of converting the borough's wastewater plant to a facility that would produce natural gas. The authority's letter appears to assert the authority's expertise in advising council on just such a venture - at no cost to the borough.




Comments
This was a slap in the face for the Authority, and could hurt the Borough in the next several decades of growth.Remember who sat in all the LASA meeting through the negotiations, the former Market House Trust. But when sequestered to be in attendance for a Borough Council Meeting, they would send one of lower Directors, not the Officers.
This could be the worst Borough Council I have ever seen, with no care of fiscal responsibility.
TidePride!
TidePride!
also, WHY did Kleen Rite leave town?????
the boro creates other new zoning to accommodate different situations, not sure how or why this happened? and WHO EVER IS RESPONSIBLE SHOULD BE LET GO. period. this town NEEDS businesses.