Click HERE to see the list.
(Amounts are NOT certified. Total due is subject to change. Interest accrues monthly on the first day of a new month.)
Friday, February 4, 2022
Thursday, February 3, 2022
Columbians comment on captions, downtown dust storm, missing money
Two Columbia residents commented on non-agenda items at the February 1, 2022 Columbia Borough Council work session.
Tom Steiner, who described himself as "hearing challenged," said the borough is supposed to abide by ADA regulations concerning closed captioning for meetings. He told council, "I cannot understand half of what you're saying" and that the captioning "has a lot to be desired." Council president Heather Zink said the captions are auto-generated by Facebook. Steiner said, "Being a government agency, I think you're required to do that."
Tom Steiner, who described himself as "hearing challenged," said the borough is supposed to abide by ADA regulations concerning closed captioning for meetings. He told council, "I cannot understand half of what you're saying" and that the captioning "has a lot to be desired." Council president Heather Zink said the captions are auto-generated by Facebook. Steiner said, "Being a government agency, I think you're required to do that."
Columbia resident Tom Steiner told council about the large amount of dust drifting from the Hotel Locust project into adjoining areas recently, as shown above.
Steiner also complained about the large amount of dust drifting from the Hotel Locust demolition project (currently underway on the 300 block of Locust Street). "You had a dust storm that was coming out of that hallway, or the alley, over there," Steiner said, referring to the BB&T bank drive-through next to the demolition site. He noted there's a practice of shooting water on such projects to control the dust, which he said would help on this project. He added that he recently saw a woman waiting in her car in the drive-through, with the windshield wipers on due to dust buildup on the windshield. "That's how bad it was," he said.
Frank Doutrich once again questioned council on the $10,000 [actually $10,643] that was found to be unaccounted for during the 2020 audit. (He had previously asked about the missing money at last week's council meeting.) He criticized council's seeming indifference toward the issue and said, "That's a no-no." He asked if there were any in-house employees available to look for the money. Zink replied that it would require a forensic audit to try to find the money and that an extra $6,000 had already been paid to the auditor to search for it, in addition to the work done by the borough finance manager. "We spent a significant amount of time looking for it," Zink said. "The bottom line is we accepted the audit."
"We can't say that nobody took it, because we don't know that," Doutrich said.
Borough solicitor Evan Gabel said that, according to the auditor, the money was not "just missing," and that someone had not taken it; the auditor just cannot find where it is in the system. He added that the auditor had said, "No one stole it." Gabel said a forensic audit had cost upwards of $40,000 in the last municipality that had to do one.
[The auditor's report was presented to full council on December 28, 2021, after being withheld for about a month. Borough manager Mark Stivers and Zink were apparently the only two borough officials to have seen the report before it was presented.]
Metered water for controlling dust at the project was available from this hydrant at North 3rd & Avenue H.
************************
"We can't say that nobody took it, because we don't know that," Doutrich said.
Borough solicitor Evan Gabel said that, according to the auditor, the money was not "just missing," and that someone had not taken it; the auditor just cannot find where it is in the system. He added that the auditor had said, "No one stole it." Gabel said a forensic audit had cost upwards of $40,000 in the last municipality that had to do one.
[The auditor's report was presented to full council on December 28, 2021, after being withheld for about a month. Borough manager Mark Stivers and Zink were apparently the only two borough officials to have seen the report before it was presented.]
Wednesday, February 2, 2022
Aument facing primary challenge from Ephrata Twp. man who led local protests, unapproved 'audit' of 2020 election
Ryan Aument, the second-term state senator representing the northern half of Lancaster County, is expected to face a primary challenger backed by groups convinced that elected Republicans failed to do everything possible to overturn Joe Biden's 2020 victory in Pennsylvania.
Michael Miller, a financial planner who lives in Ephrata Township, is taking the initial steps toward running, according to posts on social media pages used by members of FreePA and Audit the Vote PA, two conservative activist groups that are highly critical of many elected Republicans.
MORE:
Tuesday, February 1, 2022
Lancaster Twp. GOP area chair resigns, as committee prepared to remove him for 'denouncing' FreePA
The chairman of the Lancaster Township Republican Committee resigned Friday, less than one week after publishing an opinion piece that criticized plans by the county GOP to provide election training to members of a local conservative activist group known for spreading disinformation.
[Former Columbia School Board director Jenna Geesey, currently the county GOP's vice chair, will conduct election training being provided to FreePA.]
MORE:
Monday, January 31, 2022
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)