Sunday, January 18, 2026

Albatwitch Day 2026 accepting vendor applications


Columbia Borough School District proposes renovations for next 5 years | Community News | lancasteronline.com


MORGAN HUBER | FOR LNP | LANCASTERONLINE

When: Columbia Borough School board meeting, Jan. 13.

What happened: Keith Ramsey, business manager, on behalf of the property committee, proposed $1.97 million in renovation projects through the 2029-30 academic year.

Details: Anticipated improvements would include painting some of the Hill Campus interior, resurfacing the track at the football stadium, replacing the generator and storage tank at Taylor Middle School, and painting and updating the interior hallways, exterior doors, and bathroom floors at Park Elementary.

Funding: If approved, the balance of the capital improvement fund would end with $1.28 million following the implementation of these projects.

Background: Ramsey also outlined the recently completed renovation projects. This year, workers painted some of the interior of the Hill campus, replaced the stadium lights, updated the playground at Taylor Middle School and replaced exterior doors at Park Elementary.

Cost: These renovations cost the district $948,712, the lowest spending for renovations in three years.
MORE:
https://lancasteronline.com/news/regional/columbia-borough-school-district-proposes-renovations-for-next-5-years/article_36c250e7-eeeb-4add-b76e-b691ab6bd509.html 

Friday, January 16, 2026

Seen today in Columbia: a man with a message



LANCASTER AREA SEWER AUTHORITY WILL BE WORKING ON MANOR STREET PAST 6PM ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 20, 2026 | Columbia Borough Police Department


Volunteers install siding and more at Habitat for Humanity's Women Build event in Columbia [photos] | Home & Garden | lancasteronline.com


Mayor Lutz does about-face, pushes for single-hauler trash pickup


JOE LINTNER | COLUMBIA SPY 

Mayor Leo Lutz is advocating for Columbia Borough to switch to a single-hauler trash collection system. 

At Tuesday's borough council meeting, Lutz cited the number of different haulers on borough streets as one reason for going to a single hauler. "It's well over a dozen different haulers running around this town," Lutz estimated. 

Lutz: "It's time for us to get with the rest of the world...Everybody around us, and probably most of Lancaster County, is going to the single-hauler system."

"It's time for us to get with the rest of the world," Lutz said. "Everybody around us, and probably most of Lancaster County is going to the single-hauler system." Lutz previously opposed the idea when it was discussed in 2019. 

Currently, Columbia residents may select their own trash company from among several providers. Under a single-hauler system, the borough would contract with one company to handle all residential trash collection. The borough would oversee collection and payment. Lutz proposed issuing an RFP (Request for Proposal) for a single trash hauler for the borough. 

Lutz also cited cost savings for residents as another reason for using a single hauler. He said Mountville Borough, which uses a single hauler, charges $70 a quarter for trash pickup, whereas he just paid $112 for the service.

Council explored the idea in 2019

When council explored the idea at an October 2019 councilwork session, residents, business owners and Lutz opposed the idea of a single hauler.

Then-councilman John Novak opened the discussion by offering some potential positives of a single-hauler:
  • Less impact on roads
  • Less traffic
  • Reduced cost
  • Recycling improvement
  • Reduced noise pollution

Lutz, however, argued that a single-hauler would put local trash companies out of business and eliminate jobs for borough residents. He also said a large hauler wouldn't provide special pickups for items like mattresses or televisions.

"You're not going to get a big hauler to do that kind of work, that kind of assistance for you," Lutz said.

Also at that meeting, several residents commented, all of whom opposed using a single hauler:

JoAnn Fritz: "Just because you're going to get a cheap estimate - cheap is not the best."

Shirley McBride: "I've been through the single hauler, and it was an absolute nightmare."

Sharon Lintner: "Gamby is the best. As long as you pick him, I'm for it."

Kelly Kline of River Valley Disposal: "Cheaper is not better. You're not going to be able to control the quality of what you get with a single hauler."

Howard Stevens: "Mr. Gamby and River Valley - You couldn't ask for anything better."

Frank Doutrich: "Myself, I'm happy with my hauler."

Robin Gamby of Gamby's Disposal Service: "There's a lot that's been given back to this town by the trash haulers that are represented here."

Heather Zink: "Let us enjoy the good service that we enjoy."

Council revisited the topic in 2024

Council revisited the topic in September 2024, when then-President Heather Zink said tracking trash violations was difficult because the borough doesn't receive notification when companies stop service due to unpaid bills. She suggested residents could save money with a single hauler.

At that meeting, Lutz cited the pending retirements of two longtime local hauling company owners as reason to consider a single hauler, saying "the time is right."


Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Columbia Borough Council decides not to reopen 2026 budget

Kauffman: “I just wanted to give everybody the opportunity, since we have three new council members, to speak their mind since they didn't have an opportunity."

JOE LINTNER | COLUMBIA SPY 

At Tuesday night's Columbia Borough Council meeting, council decided not to reopen its 2026 budget. 

The subject had been broached at the January 5 organizational meeting when Council President Eric Kauffman said he wanted to open the budget and possibly raise taxes. At last night's meeting, however, Kauffman said he had wanted to give new councilors a chance to weigh in, since they were not yet on council when the budget was passed in December.  “I am giving you guys the opportunity if you would like to reopen the budget and maybe look at some cost savings.” Kauffman said, addressing new councilors Ethan Byers, Jeanne Cooper, and Thomas Ziegler, Jr.

Before councilors responded, resident Sharon Lintner addressed Kauffman and pointed out the inconsistency. “Tonight you said cost saving was the reason [for opening the budget]. But at the last meeting, you said it was because you were thinking about raising taxes,” Lintner said. 

Kauffman responded that he had heard there was discussion by councilors about raising taxes to protect financial reserves. Currently, general fund reserves stand at about $300,000, much lower than the recommended 15% of the budget, and the millage is 10 mills. “I just wanted to give everybody the opportunity, since we have three new council members, to speak their mind since they didn't have an opportunity,” Kauffman said.

Ethan Byers suggested splitting the difference not just through taxes and reserves but with considerable cuts, adding that he doesn't want to raise taxes for 2026. Byers also suggested a hiring freeze “maybe for the first six months of the year.” 

Brommer: “We have enacted a hiring freeze as far as the new positions that were placed in the budget."

Acting Borough Manager Jack Brommer announced that a hiring freeze is already in effect. “We have enacted a hiring freeze as far as the new positions that were placed in the budget,” Brommer said. He also noted he is expecting at least one retirement from the police department in the near future.

Council is still looking to hire a finance manager, though, according to Kauffman. The borough’s most recent finance manager resigned in December, as Columbia Spy reported HERE. Currently, finances are being outsourced to Brown Plus, an accounting firm. 

Councilors Cooper and Ziegler said they don't support opening the budget. Byers ended the discussion with a promise to move aggressively on finances: “Our plan currently is to be pretty aggressive about making financial changes this year. So, as long as we follow through on that, which I hope we do, I hope that we can make some sizable changes before the next year and not have to make any tax increases—or keep them as low as possible if we do have to do that.”