Friday, November 29, 2024
Beards for Brothers nonprofit organization supports local first responders in their fight against cancer | fox43.com
LANCASTER COUNTY, Pa. — It's the season of giving and one Lancaster County nonprofit wants to make sure first responders who dedicate their lives to serve and protect us, also receive support in a time of need.
Beards for Brothers, a fundraiser that started 10 years ago, raises money to support first responders and their immediate families in their fight against cancer.
MORE:
Restaurant Inspections - Columbia Borough - November 29, 2024
Our Lady of the Angels School/Holy Trinity Church, 404 Cherry St., Columbia, Nov. 21. Pass. No violations.
Smoke N Chill, 353 Cherry St., Columbia, Nov. 21. Pass. Food employee (owner) observed in the food preparation area not wearing proper hair restraints, such as nets or hats. Food facility is offering for sale Venera Zkittlez THCA+ D9 + THCP Vegan Gummies distributed by AVA Distribution LLC, which contain an unapproved additive as specified in 21 CFR 170-180 relating to food additives. Such products are under U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulation and at which time Delta 9 and THC are not recognizable as a safe substance to be added to food. Food facility does not have available sanitizer test strips or test kit to determine appropriate sanitizer concentration of quaternary ammonia.
George Christopher's, 15 S. Third St., Columbia, Nov. 16. Pass. No violations.
Inna's Pierogi Shop, 15 N. Third St., Columbia, opening, Nov. 16. Pass. No violations.
King's Butcher Shop, 15 S. Third St., Columbia, opening, Nov. 16. Pass. Food Facility is offering for sale foods prepared in an unapproved private home. Sauerkraut being sold under the name of Kreative Kraut by The Sauerkraut Guy is from an unapproved source.
Columbia Borough 2025 budget available for inspection
Notice is hereby given by Columbia Borough Council, Lancaster County, PA, that the proposed budget for the fiscal year 2025 is available for inspection, and that it intends to adopt Ordinance 954 establishing a general purpose tax rate at 10 mills on assessed value of real estate for the year 2025. All other taxes levied by the Borough shall remain unchanged from 2024 values in 2025. The budget and ordinance will be adopted at a scheduled Borough Council Meeting on December 10, 2024. The meeting will commence at 7:00 p.m. in the Columbia Borough office located at 308 Locust Street, Columbia, PA 17512. A copy of the proposed budget and full text of the proposed Ordinance may be examined at the Columbia Borough office located at 308 Locust Street, Columbia, PA 17512 during normal business hours.
By: Evan Gabel, Solicitor
Columbia Borough
Public Notice - published 11/29/2024
LNP Media Group, Inc.
LNP Media Group, Inc.
Columbia Borough seeking bids for Franklin Street property
700 Franklin Street
Notice is hereby given that the Borough Council of the Borough of Columbia (the "Borough"), Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, is seeking qualified bids for the sale of a residential structure located upon the Borough's property at the address of 700 Franklin Street, Columbia, PA 17512, Account No. 1102847300000 (the "Property").
Sealed bids will be accepted by the Borough until December 23, 2024, 12:00 pm EST. All bids shall be received by the Borough at its offices located at 308 Locust Street, Columbia, PA 17512. The bids shall be opened at 12:00 pm EST on December 23, 2024 at the Borough offices. The award of the contract of sale shall be made by public announcement at the regularly scheduled meeting of Borough Council on December 23, 2024 at 7:00 pm at the Borough offices.
The Borough property to be sold consists of the residential structure on the Property (the "Structure"). The Structure consists of a two and a half story residential building. NO accessory buildings are included. The Structure is being sold in "as is, where is" condition without any warranty or guaranty of fitness for a particular purpose or merchantability, whether express or implied.
The Structure is being sold pursuant to written Terms and Conditions of Sale. The Terms and Conditions of Sale contain information regarding the structure to be sold, bid procedures, and the terms and conditions of sale. Interested bidders may obtain a copy of the Terms and Conditions of Sale by contacting the Borough at 717-684-2467 or in person at the Borough offices, located at 308 Locust Street, Columbia, PA 17512.
Each sealed bid must be accompanied by a certified check or cashier's check, made payable to the Borough, in an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the bidder's total purchase price, as a deposit towards the purchase price for the Structure, and as security for the bidder's purchase of the Structure in the event the Borough accepts the bid.
The highest qualified bid shall be accepted on the condition that the purchase price shall be paid within 60 days of the acceptance of bids.
The sale of the Structure will be accompanied by a limited permission to enter the Property to remove and relocate the Structure. The accepted bidder will be required to remove the Structure from the Property by April 1, 2025. The successful bidder shall obtain an insurance policy providing general liability insurance with minimum coverage limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate. The Borough of Columbia shall be named as an additional insured and loss payee. The successful bidder shall also provide a performance bond with surety in the contract amount but no less than $100,000 to ensure the successful bidder's faithful performance of the contract and all obligations arising thereunder, including, but not limited to, the removal and relocation of the Structure.
No bidder may withdrawal a bid within thirty (30) days after the date set for the opening of bids.
The Borough reserves the right to reject any and all bids, or parts thereof, as the Borough Council deem to be in the best interest of the Borough. The Borough reserves the right to waive any defects or irregularities in the bids.
Interested parties may submit any questions regarding this bid to: Steve Kaufhold, Borough Manager at skaufhold@columbiapa.net. Please call the Borough office at 717-684-2467 to inspect the Property. Private inspections are by appointment only.
By: Evan Gabel, Solicitor
Columbia Borough
Public Notice - published 11/29/2024
LNP Media Group, Inc.
Thursday, November 28, 2024
Sealed bids for Chip Factory Hampton Inn, Columbia, PA _ Site Improvements, Demolition, Abatement, and Masonry Restoration
Sealed bids for Chip Factory Hampton Inn, Columbia, PA _ Site Improvements, Demolition, Abatement, and Masonry Restoration will be received and opened publicly at the Wohlsen Construction Office located at 1295 Manheim Pike, Lancaster, PA 17601 on December 20th at 4:00 PM.
Notice is hereby given to bidders that construction of this project is being funded, in part, by a federal grant provided to Lancaster County from the U.S. Dept of Housing and Urban Development and is subject to the Davis Bacon Act of March 3, 1931, as amended. Wages must be paid by contractors according to the U.S. Department's Wage Decision included in the specifications. All bidders must also comply with the requirements of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968; the Executive Order of 11246 or any other order which prohibits discrimination in employment. All bidders are advised that an executed Attachment B from the Section 3 Action Plan included in the specifications must be submitted or the bid will be rejected as non-responsive.
Project documents and supplemental information can be found on the Construction Manager's online bidding platform, Building Connected. https://app.buildingconnected.com/public/565f4533a894a40f0072a364
Qualified Minority and Women-Owned Businesses (MBE/WBE) are encouraged to respond to the Invitation to Bid.
Public Notice - published 11/28/2024
LNP Media Group, Inc.
Notice is hereby given to bidders that construction of this project is being funded, in part, by a federal grant provided to Lancaster County from the U.S. Dept of Housing and Urban Development and is subject to the Davis Bacon Act of March 3, 1931, as amended. Wages must be paid by contractors according to the U.S. Department's Wage Decision included in the specifications. All bidders must also comply with the requirements of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968; the Executive Order of 11246 or any other order which prohibits discrimination in employment. All bidders are advised that an executed Attachment B from the Section 3 Action Plan included in the specifications must be submitted or the bid will be rejected as non-responsive.
Project documents and supplemental information can be found on the Construction Manager's online bidding platform, Building Connected. https://app.buildingconnected.com/public/565f4533a894a40f0072a364
Qualified Minority and Women-Owned Businesses (MBE/WBE) are encouraged to respond to the Invitation to Bid.
Public Notice - published 11/28/2024
LNP Media Group, Inc.
Council settles on original 2-mill tax hike after multiple failed proposals
Council voted 5-2 Tuesday night to increase millage by 2 mills, raising the total municipal millage to 10 mills. Peter Stahl and Joanne Geesey voted against the proposal.
After several failed attempts to modify the proposed tax increase, council ultimately reverted to its original 2-mill proposal. The decision on the millage rate was particularly time-sensitive Tuesday night, as council needed to advertise the budget before deadline. The ad would necessarily include a proposed millage rate. After advertising, council will take a final vote in December. The increase will bring the total municipal millage to 10 mills.
The meeting began with council supporting a 2-mill increase. However, Mayor Leo Lutz unexpectedly suggested reducing it to 1 mill, citing his recent budget review.
Councilman Peter Stahl went further, advocating for no increase at all. He argued that council had not sufficiently addressed expenses and underlying issues. Stahl expressed concern that a tax increase would reduce the pressure on council to tackle necessary cost-cutting measures.
“If we pass the tax increase that will solve our problem this year, we’re not going to solve the long-term problem in the next year or even the following years,” Stahl said. “It’s just going to kick it down the road until we gotta raise taxes again.”
Later in the discussion, Stahl added, “We have the opportunity right now to hold our feet to the fire . . . Some of these topics are going to be hard to talk about.”
Lutz said that while he agreed with Stahl in principle, he wanted to proceed “with a little more ease,” which is why he recommended a 1-mill increase.
The meeting began with council supporting a 2-mill increase. However, Mayor Leo Lutz unexpectedly suggested reducing it to 1 mill, citing his recent budget review.
Councilman Peter Stahl went further, advocating for no increase at all. He argued that council had not sufficiently addressed expenses and underlying issues. Stahl expressed concern that a tax increase would reduce the pressure on council to tackle necessary cost-cutting measures.
Stahl: “Why are we raising taxes when we didn't draw below 15%? Makes no sense to me.” [File photo]
Later in the discussion, Stahl added, “We have the opportunity right now to hold our feet to the fire . . . Some of these topics are going to be hard to talk about.”
Lutz said that while he agreed with Stahl in principle, he wanted to proceed “with a little more ease,” which is why he recommended a 1-mill increase.
Zink: "It's time to pay the piper."
[File photo]
Council President Heather Zink said, “We’ve gotta do something about the debt service . . . We’ve been saying let’s put it off. It’s time to pay the piper.”
A topic of concern was the amount still held in reserves, currently $1.6-1.7 million, or 19% of the budget. According to borough ordinance, that amount cannot dip below 15%. Some council members were concerned that without raising taxes, it would be necessary to borrow from reserves, which could fall below the lower limit.
During discussion, Councilman Todd Burgard proposed a compromise rate of 1.5 mills. After debating each proposal, council voted on the various options, but all were rejected. With no resolution in sight, council made a final attempt to pass the original 2-mill increase, which succeeded with a 5-2 vote. Councilors Stahl and Joanne Geesey cast the dissenting votes. A subsequent vote approved advertising the budget for public inspection, at 2 mills.
The situation highlighted council's missed opportunities for budget review, as a budget meeting and at least two work sessions had been canceled throughout the year, limiting chances for a detailed expense analysis.
During the voting process, it was often unclear who supported which proposal, until the final roll call vote brought clarity to the matter.
During public comment, resident Sharon Lintner addressed the council, discussing ongoing projects and expressing concerns about how higher taxes would impact economic development and quality of life in the community.
“The borough has had a tendency to have too many irons in the fire at once with major projects," Lintner said. “With this looming tax increase, how much is economic development and home ownership worth to you as a council? I keep hearing we want economic development, we want home ownership, but you're going to keep driving it away if you keep raising taxes year after year.”
A topic of concern was the amount still held in reserves, currently $1.6-1.7 million, or 19% of the budget. According to borough ordinance, that amount cannot dip below 15%. Some council members were concerned that without raising taxes, it would be necessary to borrow from reserves, which could fall below the lower limit.
During discussion, Councilman Todd Burgard proposed a compromise rate of 1.5 mills. After debating each proposal, council voted on the various options, but all were rejected. With no resolution in sight, council made a final attempt to pass the original 2-mill increase, which succeeded with a 5-2 vote. Councilors Stahl and Joanne Geesey cast the dissenting votes. A subsequent vote approved advertising the budget for public inspection, at 2 mills.
The situation highlighted council's missed opportunities for budget review, as a budget meeting and at least two work sessions had been canceled throughout the year, limiting chances for a detailed expense analysis.
During the voting process, it was often unclear who supported which proposal, until the final roll call vote brought clarity to the matter.
During public comment, resident Sharon Lintner addressed the council, discussing ongoing projects and expressing concerns about how higher taxes would impact economic development and quality of life in the community.
“The borough has had a tendency to have too many irons in the fire at once with major projects," Lintner said. “With this looming tax increase, how much is economic development and home ownership worth to you as a council? I keep hearing we want economic development, we want home ownership, but you're going to keep driving it away if you keep raising taxes year after year.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)